Odziv geodetskih instrumentov GNSS na motenje z oddajnikom preletnega signala L1

Operation of geodetic GNSS instruments under chirp signal L1 jamming

Author(s):

Franc Dimc, Polona Pavlovčič Prešeren, Matej Bažec

Abstract:

This paper presents the results of a vulnerability test of several geodetic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers in case of intentional signal interference in the frequency L1 for GPS (Global Positioning System). Nine instruments from different manufacturers (i.e., Leica Geosystems AG, Trimble Inc., Javad GNSS) were tested. The test was based on static and kinematic jamming. A static scenario with three-minute interruptions was followed by experiments with a stationary jammer located at distances from 10 m to 160 m from the receivers. For short-term kinematic interference, the jammer was installed in the vehicle, which passed the GNSS instruments at different speeds. An analysis of different scenarios showed that the jammer interrupted GPS but not GLONASS signals in certain situations. Since Galileo was not nominally operational at the time of the July 2019 measurements, only GPS and GLONASS were eligible for the study. The geodetic GNSS instruments reacted to the interruptions with a decreased signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and either with a complete inability to determine the code/phase position or with an incorrect calculation of phase ambiguities (initialization), which also affected the quality of the positioning. The proximity of the jammer played the most significant role in the complete inability to receive the signal; however, for the incorrect positioning longer duration of jamming was also a reason.

Keywords:

GNSS, intentional signal interference, jammer L1, signal interruptions, signal-to-noise ratio

DOI: 10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2021.02.189-204

Citation:

Franc Dimc, Polona Pavlovčič Prešeren, Matej Bažec (2021). Odziv geodetskih instrumentov GNSS na motenje z oddajnikom preletnega signala L1. | Operation of geodetic GNSS instruments under chirp signal L1 jamming. Geodetski vestnik, 65 (2), 189-204. DOI: 10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2021.02.189-204